Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

äÉμï½ñø¿¡¼­ÀÇ ù»äÉΨÔéÀÇ Û¯ÞÒàÊùÊîÜ á¶Ì¸

Radiological Study of The Condylar Heads In Temporomandibular Joint Arthrosis

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1985³â 15±Ç 1È£ p.13 ~ 20
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À¯µ¿¼ö(êåÔÔâª)/Dong Soo You

Abstract

äÉμï½ñøü´íº, Ñûí­ 114Ù£, åüí­ 262Ù£, õÅ 376Ù£À» ÓßßÚÀ¸·Î Oblique lateral transcranial
ProjectionÀ¸·Î õÉç¯ÇÑ ý­ tracingÇÏ¿© äÉμï½ñøÀÇ ñ«ñøßÒÀÎ ÔÙ÷Ô, μï½íÚëå, ËÒÏ¢î¡äô, îºíÄ
ÍÝÑñ¿¡ µû¶ó ΨÔéÀÇ åÖîÜܨûù¸¦ ðàÞÛÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ì¿Íý¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. äÉμï½ñøü´íº õÅ 376Ù£ ñé Ñûí­°¡ 114Ù£, åüí­°¡ 162Ù£À¸·Î åüí­¿¡¼­ úéîÊÈ÷ ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç,
Ñûí­¿¡¼­ ÔÙ÷ÔÀÌ 60Ù£(52.6%), μï½íÚëåÀÌ 28Ù£(24.6%), ËÒÏ¢î¡äô°¡ 21Ù£(18.4%), îºíÄÍÝÑñÀÌ
5Ù£(4.4%)ÀÌ¿´°í. åüí­¿¡¼­ ÔÙ÷ÔÀÌ 148Ù£(56.5%), μï½íÚëåÀÌ 57Ù£(21.8%), ËÒÏ¢î¡äô°¡ 47Ù£
(17.9%), îºíÄÍÝÑñÀÌ 10Ù£(3.8%)À¸·Î ñøßÒÀº Ñû¡¤åü ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ºñ½ÁÇÑ Ýï×ËÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
2. ïáßÈÏØ¿¡¼­ Ñûí­´Â W-W'°¡ éÓñ§ö° °¢°¢ 14.52§®, 14.13§®, O-H°¡ 13.92§®, 13.71§®,
O-A°¡ 8.91§®, 9.03§®, O-B´Â 8.67§®, 8.78§®¿´°í, åüí­¿¡¼­ W-W'´Â 13.77§®, 13.51§®, O-H
´Â 13.42§®, 13.35§®, O-A´Â 8.92§®, 9.01§®, ±×¸®°í O-B´Â 8.59§®, 8.80§®¿´´Ù.
3. äÉμï½ñøü´íºÏØ¿¡¼­ W-W'¿Í O-H°¡ ïáßÈÏØ¿¡ ºñÇØ ¶Ñ·ÇÀÌ ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù. W-W'´Â ËÒÏ¢î¡
äô¸¦ ñ«áÍ·Î ÇÏ´Â Ñûåü¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ÀÛ¾Ò°í(12.70§®, 13.00§®), O-H´Â Ñû¡¤åü ¸ðµÎ ÔÙ÷Ô¿¡¼­ °¡
Àå ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù. μï½íÚëå¿¡¼± O-H, O-A, O-B¿¡¼­ ïáßÈÏØ°ú ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ ó¬×並 º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç,
O-B´ÂîºíÄÍÝÑñÀ» ð¶èâÇÑ öâñøßÒ¿¡¼­ ïáßÈßÒ°ú º° ó¬ì¶°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù
ñøßÈ¿¡ µû¸¥ ΨÔéÀÇ åÖîÜܨûù´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù.
a) ÔÙ÷ÔÀ» ñ«áÍ·Î ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì, Ñûí­ÀÇ W-W'´Â éÓñ§ö° ÊÀÊÀ 13.80§®, 12.80§®, O-H´Â 13.10
§®, 12.90§®, O-A´Â 8.69§®, 8.18§®, O-B´Â 8.33§®, 8.42§®¿´À¸¸ç, åüí­¿¡¼­´Â W-W'°¡ 13.01
§®, 12.90§®, O-H°¡ 12.48§®, 12.80§®, O-A°¡ 8.60§®, 8.49§®, O-B°¡ 8.48§®, 8.50§®¿´´Ù.
b) μï½íÚëå¿¡¼± Ñûí­°¡ W-W'´Â 13.70§®, 13.10§®, O-H´Â 13.90§®, 13.10§®, O-A´Â 8.81
§®, 8.16§®, O-B´Â 8.34§®, 8.25§®¿´°í, åüí­¿¡¼­ W-W'´Â 13.10§®, 12.50§®, O-H´Â 13.30§®,
12.91§®, O-A´Â 8.95§®, 8.49§®, O-B´Â 8.23§®, 8.70§®¿´´Ù.
c) ËÒÏ¢î¡äô´Â Ñûí­¿¡¼­ W-W'°¡ 12.70§®, 13.00§®, O-H´Â 13.40§®, 13.40§®, O-A´Â 8.37
§®, 8.48§®, O-B´Â 8.33§®, 8.62§®¿´°í, åüí­¿¡¼­´Â W-W'°¡ 13.00, 12.50§®, O-H´Â 12.90,
13.10§®, O-A´Â 8.49, 8.09§®, O-B´Â 8.77, 8.01§®¿´´Ù.
d) îºíÄÍÝÑñÀÇ °æ¿ì Ñûí­´Â W-W'°¡ 13.30§®, 13.20§®, O-H°¡ 13.40, 12.60§®, O-A´Â 8.26
§®, 8.32§®, O-B´Â 7.80§®, 8.02§®¿´°í, åüí­´Â W-W'°¡ 12.30§®, 12.00§®, O-H´Â 13.10§®,
13.20§®, O-A´Â 8.68§®, 7.95§®, O-B´Â 7.46§®, 7.87§®¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The author obtained the oblique lateral transcranial radiograms from 376 patients (114
of male, and 262 of female) with temporomandibular joint arthrosis. After tracing each
film, the author analyzed the dimensional changes of the condylar heads with pain,
clicking, mouth opening limitation, and masticatory difficulty respectively, which were
the chief complaints of the TMJ arthrosis and compared these data with control group.
The results were as follows ;
1. There was a great predilection for occurrence of the TMJ arthrosis in female (262
cases) over male (114 cases). But there was no significant difference in ratio between
the sexes on each symptom.
In male, 60 patients (52.6%) had pain, 28 patients (2f .6%) had clicking,21 patients
(18.4%) had mouth opening limitation, and S patients (4.4%) had masticatory difficulty.
In female, 148 patients (56.5%) had pain, 57 patients (21.8%) had clicking, 47
patients(17.9%) had mouth opening limitation, and 10 patients (3.8%) had masticatory
difficulty
2. Examined controlled group, the author analyzed the dimension of W-W', O-H, 0-4,
O-B on the right side first, and left side second. In male, the dimension of W-W' was
14.52§®, 14.13§® ; O-H was 13.92§®, 13.71§® O-A was 8.91§®, 9.03§® and O-B was 8.67
§®, 8.78§®.
In female, W-W' was 13.77§®, 13.51§® ; O-H was 13.42§®, 13.35§®; O-A was 8.92§®,
9.0l§® ; and O-B was 8.59§®, 8.80§®.
3. W-W' and O-H of the experimental group were distinctly lesser than the controlled
group. Male with mouth opening limitation show the least (12.70§®, 13.00§®) on W-W',
but both sexes with pain show the least on O-H.
There was no significant difference between experimental group with clicking and
controlled group on O-H,0-4, and O-B.
And also there was no difference on O-B in patients with every symptom except
masticatory difficulty.
The dimensional changes of the condylar heads with those symptoms were as follows ;
a) In male patients, complains of pain, W-W' of tar right and left was 13.80§®, 12.80§® ;
O-H was 13.10§®, 12.90§® ; O-A was 8.69§®, 8.18§® ; O-B was 8.33§®, 8.42§®.
In female, W-W' was 13.01§®, 12.90§® ; O-H was, 12.90§® ; O-H was 12.48§®, 12.80§®
; O-A was 8.60§®, 8.49§®: O-B was 8.48§®, 8.50§®
b) In male patients with clicking, W-W' was 13.70§®, 13.10§® ; O-H was 13.90§®, 13.10
§® ; O-A was 8.81§®, 8.16§® O-B was 8.34§®, 8.25§®. In female, W-W' was 13.10§®,
13.50§® ; O-H was 13.30§®, 12.91§® ; O-A was 8.95§®, 8.49§® ; O-B was 8.23§®, 8.70§®.
c) In male patients with mouth opening limitation, W-W' was 12.70§®, 13.00§®; O-H
was 13.40§®, 13.40§® ; O-A was 8.37§®, 8.48§® ; O-B was 8.33§®, 8.62§®.
In female, W-W' was 13.00§®, 12.50§® ; O-H was 12.90§®, 13.10§®; O-A was 8.49§®,
8.09§®; O-B was 8.77§®, 8.01§®.
d) In male patients with masticatory difficulty, W-W' was 13.30§®, 13.20§® ; O-H was
13.40§®,12.60§® ; O-A was 8.26§®, 8.32§® ; O-B was 7.80§®, 8.20§®.
In female, W-W' was 12.30§®, 12.00§® ; O-H was 13.10§®, 13.20§® ; O-A was 8.68§®,
7.95§® ; O-B was 7.46§®, 7.87§®.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸